America’s shopping center evolution: The value of visibility
Nov 18, 2013
Eugene R. Szkilnyk
CCIM
Director, Integra Realty Resources - DetroitShopping centers burst onto the scene in the 1920s as natural additions to bustling community centers and quickly grew to embody American retail culture. More than 16,400 centers popped-up in the U.S. by 1975, transitioning from a collection of small local shops to huge retail destinations. Developers embraced the bigger is better mantra, linking increased center size with skyrocketing sales and expanding properties to full capacity.
But all good things must come to an end. In the 1990s, mega-center sales dwindled, eventually leading to slow deaths nationwide. While old centers struggled to stay afloat, streamlined designs emerged to take the place of their predecessors, giving rise to smaller, highly visible centers.
Today, the shopping center landscape consists of both the older, larger centers and the newer, smaller properties. For investors and appraisers alike, understanding the differences between the two — from visibility to vacancy rates — is key to making smart investments.
What shopping center visibility means for investors
The biggest factor driving shopping center revenue is visibility. As I briefly discussed in my last post, shopping center visibility influences the amount of vehicle and pedestrian traffic stores receive. Visibility can extend sales for tenants while also increasing rent rates for landlords, a win-win for all parties.
Developers of older shopping centers failed to capitalize on visibility, limiting customer traffic. The shopping centers of the 1970s and 80s, which often contained two large anchor stores (typically a department store or grocery store) and multiple midlevel retailers, positioned themselves between 400 and 500 feet from a highway, far out of sight of passing traffic. Developers took note of past missteps and, starting in the 1990s, pushed their store fronts as close to the street as possible in attempt to retain 85 percent visibility with relation to the street to draw more customers.
Investors interested in a shopping center would be wise to note not only its proximity to the street, but also its configuration and how that impacts visibility. In L-shaped shopping centers, for example, the stores located on the end caps tend to sit closer to the road and retain high visibility, but elbow positions with lower visibility will suffer.
In an optimal center configuration, big box destination tenants such as Walmart or Target, which draw traffic regardless of visibility, would yield end caps to smaller retailers to draw in more pedestrian and vehicular traffic across all stores.
Naturally, visibility plays an important role in shopping center valuation. To accurately value a center, appraisers must take into account individual rent rates, which are influenced by the visibility of each store. Less visibility means lower foot traffic, which means lower tenant sales, reduced rent rates, and ultimately shrinking investor profits. As I explained in my last post, if appraisers calculate blanket rental rates for the entire center without taking location into account, they’ll overestimate the total price.
How shopping center visibility is linked to vacancy rates
When valuing shopping centers, some appraisers assess vacancy rates through a blanket method. They gather vacancy rates for shopping centers within a three-mile radius and then apply the standard rate to the center of interest. But because vacancy rates are highly influenced by visibility, be sure the comparables are properties with similar visibility. If the center of interest is 400 feet off the street, for example, appraisers should only look at the vacancy rates of other properties also 400 feet back.
Tenants in less visible centers gross less revenue, and this can raise vacancy rates. Using more visible centers to value a less visible center will artificially drive up the valuation and lead investors to overpay. But as we learned earlier, even individual shops within shopping centers have differing visibilities, and therefore different vacancy rates. To attain the true value of a shopping center, appraisers must drill down into the visibility of specific locations within the center in order to calculate an appropriate vacancy rate.
Americans no longer live in the shopping center heyday of the 1970s, yet remnants of the past still remain. The intermixed shopping center landscape offers investors a plethora of properties to add to their portfolios, yet they must be wary if they plan to see a return on their investment. When purchasing an older shopping center, it’s crucial that investors choose an appraiser who’s well versed in shopping center valuation. With proper upfront research, investors can ensure they pay a fair market price and maximize their return on investment.
